The Color “Fair” or How Fair is Fair? | Anglo-Saxon Israel

The Color “Fair” or How Fair is Fair?

By Dennis Wright, Shepherd of Zadok

Noah Webster’s 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language was produced during the years when the American home, church and school were established upon a Biblical and a patriotic basis. Webster, descended on his mother’s side from a Pilgrim Governor, had made important contributions to the American educational system, which had kept the nation upon a Christian Constitutional course for many years. It is not surprising, therefore, that the 1828 American Dictionary should contain the greatest number of Biblical definitions given in any secular volume.

Webster considered “education useless without the Bible.”

Through the years, many words and their original fixed definitions have been altered, masked over, and corrupted as this early American foundational dictionary so aptly testifies to. Many of these “modern” definitions, derivatives, and supplemental addendums have worked to the detriment of our once proud Christian society.

Today, we are going to examine just one word in particular, that has great significant value and application to Christian Israel. That word is f-a-i-r. That’s right, fair. As I gaze upon my 1828 Webster’s dictionary, I see 17 different definitions listed for this adjective. Like most dictionaries, they are listed according to their usage and frequency. Let’s examine the #1 slotted definition.

1. FAIR : free from spots; free from a dark hue; white; as a fair skin; a fair complexion. And then there are 16 more…. Don’t believe it, Check it for yourself.

Good luck attempting to locate this early essential, and fundamental definition in your “modern” dictionaries, including Webster’s! The name of this game is verbal subterfuge, as you will soon find out.

Several other related words are mentioned in today’s Bible verses, and they are:

“Ruddy“…The word Adam is translated from a Hebrew word “aw-dawm.” (Strong’s Concord
ance, #119 and #120)

The word “Adam” means “ruddy” (#120), To SHOW BLOOD (in the face), FLUSH OR TURN ROSEY, BE (made) RED (ruddy).” (As in rosy cheeks or in a blushing face.) This cleary shows that the Hebrew meaning of the word “Adam” is “one who shows blood in the face,” identifying him as a WHITE MAN. Adam was ruddy…he could blush…he could show blood in the face… he can turn red in the face due to a fair complexion. Adam was the beginning of the White Race upon this earth. “Fair skin” and “fair countenance” are always associated, Biblically, with white skin and noted accordingly, as you will soon read below.

Therefore the Holy Bible is the History of the White Race; Later to become known as “ANGLO-SAXONS” after Isaac, as the Scriptures relate.

“….IN ISAAC SHALL THY SEED BE CALLED.” (Genesis 21:12) (Note that the Jews do NOT recognize the Anglo-Saxons as Israelites despite this prophecy!)

“Sapphire“….in any dictionary reads: The blue color of the gem sapphire. This is used Biblically, in reference to “BLUE EYES,” when describing certain “Adamic Men.”

The declaration of the Scripture states, “This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him.”…. Genesis 5:1

It therefore becomes imperative that we explore, ponder and investigate all we can about the man Adam and his descendants. Our first great clue to understanding the man Adam is to understand the meaning of his name, which we now know. After establishing the proper background, we may then proceed to examine his descendants in the Book of Adam (Bible).

We know the Bible says Jesus was related to David and that our Lord Jesus Christ would descend from David’s royal lineage. David was very well known for his fair complexion, very red hair, and crystal blue eyes. So when we read the Biblical descriptions of our various ancesters, Abraham, Sarah, David, Moses, and ultimately Jesus; we know that our Savior passed the royal blue-blood test.

Before we view specific Scriptures verifying the racial validity of our Messiah, Jesus Christ, let us begin by first examining the various branches within the genetic tree. You must first begin with their origin, where it all started, with Adam and his descendants (the Caucasian Race). The Bible is NOT the History of the other races! You will find the beginning of the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, Germanic, Scandinavian and Kindred People (Caucasians) at Genesis 5:3 and ending at 5:32. This listing takes us to Noah and his 3 sons: Shem, Ham, and Japheth.

Next, we investigate Shem’s ancestry, which takes us from Shem to Abram (Abraham). This is located in Genesis 11:10-11:26.

And finally, we establish the racial link between (King) David and Jesus Christ. This ancestral root begins in Matthew 1:1 and continues to verse 16.

The Book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham…(2) Abraham begat Judas and his brethren…(6) And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon…(16). And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.

Explore these proofs and others, in the following Passages. Could anything be plainer ?

The Linear Proofs of the Genealogies that Lead to The Christ

Adam to Shem…..Genesis 5:3-5:32

Shem to Abram (Abraham)…. Genesis 11:10-11:26

Abraham to Jesus Christ…..Matthew 1:1-16

OLD TESTAMENT REFERENCES

And it came to pass, when he (Abram) was come near to enter into Egypt, that he said unto Sarah his wife, Behold now, I know that thou art a fair woman to look upon……(Gen. 12: 2)

And it came to pass, that when Abram was come into Egypt, the Egyptians beheld the woman (Sarah) that she was very fair…..(Gen. 12: 14)

And the damsel ( Rebekah, Isaac’s future wife) was very fair to look upon, a virgin, neither had any man known her:…..(Gen. 24: 16)

“She is my sister: for he ( Abraham) feared to say, She is my wife; lest, said he, the men of the place should kill me for Rebekah; because she was fair to look upon…..(Gen. 26:7)

“..is not her younger sister ( Samson’s wife’s sister) fairer than she ?”……(Judges 15:2)

“And he sent, and brought him ( David ) in. Now he was ruddy, and withal of a beautiful countenance, and goodly to look at. And the Lord said, Arise anoint him: for this is he…..(1 Sam.16:12)…… Later in the New Testament Jesus said:……”I am the root and the OFFSPRING of David”……( to see the rest of this verse, see NT, (Rev. 22:16). This verse shows JESUS\’ DIRECT LINEAR descent from David.

“And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, ruddy, and of a fair countenance.”…..(1 Sam.17:42)

And it came to pass after this, the Absalom the son of David had a fair sister whose name was Tamar; she was a woman of a fair countenance. Ammon, the son of David loved her….. (2 Sam.13:1)

And unto Absalom ( third son of David) there were born three sons, and one daughter, whose name was Tamar: who was a woman of a fair countenance ….(.2 Sam.14:27)

<!– Well, THIS story is some bull-dung that doesn’t belong in the Bible – wmfinck –>

To bring Vashti the queen before the king ( Ahsauerus) with the crown royal, to shew the people and the princes her beauty: for she was fair to look on…..(Esther 2:2)

And he brought up Hadassah, that is, Esther, his uncle’s daughter: for she had neither father nor mother, and the amid was fair and beautiful…..(Esther 2:7)

And in all the land were no women found so fair as the daughters of Job…..(Job 42:15)

Purge me with hyssop, and I shall be clean: wash me, and I shall be whiter than snow…..(Psalm 5:17)

“My beloved is white and ruddy, the chiefest among ten thousand.” …..(Song of Solomon 5:10)

“Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk., they were more ruddy in body than rubies, their polishing was of sapphire…..(Lam 4:7)

Behold, the Assyrian was a cedar in Lebanon with fair branches…..(Ezekiel 31:3)

I have made him fair by the multitude of his branches…..(Ezekiel 31: 9)

New Testament References

“I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the ROOT and the OFFSPRING of David, and the bright and morning star”…..(Rev. 22:16)

“I am, Jesus of Nazareth, whom thou persecutest.”…..(Acts 22: 8)…..Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter then milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies their polishing was of sapphire…..(Lam. 4:7…OT)

“This is Jesus the prophet of Nazareth of Galilee.”….(Mat. 21: 11)

“And they were all amazed and marvelled, saying one to another, Behold, are not all these which speak Galilaeans?”…..(Acts 2:7)

“Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve (11 Galilaeans ) , and one of you is a devil?”…..(John 6: 70) …All of the apostles were Galilaeans except Judas Iscariot, who was named after an Edomite town, according to the first century historian Josephus.

“In which time Moses was born, and was exceeding fair.”….(Acts 7: 20)

Within the time frame of the last several centuries, great changes have taken place within our Bibles and dictionaries. Changes to particular passages, words and meanings have impaired the quality of the written word and in other cases, obscured the sense of the original language(s). Some words have fallen into disuse; and others simply do NOT reflect the same meaning now, as they once did, when they were first introduced into the older Bible translations.

These very same words are currently being used to reflect a completely different application (i.e. meaning/definition) from that which they were originally intended, when the translation was first undertaken. The effect of these changes is that, many of these words are presently NOT fully understood as to their intended original meaning by the vast majority of the rank and file readership. Most of these readers have only superficial interest and posses limited intellectual curiosity to access a competent commentary, in order to self-discover these hidden truths. Such changes in meaning render blatantly false and entirely dissimilar meanings/definitions than the ones originally intended, thus, hoodwinking the unsuspecting reader. Whenever words are understood in a different sense from that which they were intended, and differ from that of the original languages, then, they will NOT present to the reader the true \’Word of God.\’ Mistakes in any form of written communication, can be extremely injurious.

My own view of this subject is that any version of the Scriptures being translated for popular use should consist of precise vocabulary words, expressing and reflecting the original sense and primary meaning, which would then suggest, the most common and direct application in popular usage at the time of writing. This primary definition would then introduce the reader to the inherent true meaning of the word, according to the original language. Many suspect words, ( \’fair\’ for example) in our present translations, fail to do this, and they are glossed over by political correctness and “the doctrines of men.”

The vocabulary in our Bibles has both, in the past and present, generated considerable influence in formulating and preserving our national heritage, language, culture, and character. Therefore, in the final analysis, the language of the Scriptures ought to be pure, chaste, simple, and perspicuous, free from words or phrases that mislead or misrepresent the original autographs/authors. It should be ‘surgically scrubbed\’ to remove the complexities of hidden agendas, church politics, and the hands of denominational antichrists.

Now then, once again, please check Noah Webster’s 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language, if you truly desire the ultimate truth and the original intent, of the word \’fair\’.

The truth will set you free.