Part 5: Race-Mixing in Genesis 2, 3 & 4
The Enmity, Part 5: Race-Mixing in Genesis 2, 3 & 4Enmity, Part 5: Race-Mixing in Genesis 2, 3 & 4 By Pastor Eli James “And Adam knew that his wife Eve had conceived from Sammael the angel (of death) and she became pregnant and bore Cain. And he was like those on high and not like those below. And she said, ‘I have gotten a man from the angel of the LORD.’” – Targum Pseudo-Jonathan, Gen. 4:1.
Creationism Versus Evolutionism: Parting Shots In Parts 1-4, I have argued for New Paradigm of pre-historic research, and that is a Paradigm which rejects both Creationism and Evolutionism in favor of a comparison of Natural History with the original Hebrew language of Gen. 1-3. When this is done, the apparent contradictions between Scripture and the geological record disappear. The contradictions of the creationists are caused by substituting the language of the English translations, as in the KJV, for the much less contradictory language of the original Hebrew. If modern translations would accurately reflect the Hebrew language in Genesis, there would be hardly any problems of internal, Scriptural contradictions nor blatant contradictions with the geological record. For example, Creationists are forced to speculate that all of the geological strata, with their tremendous variations in layers of deposits, were deposited on the “day of Creation,” circa 4004 BC, according to Archbishop Ussher’s chronology. But this view is absurd, as the “six 24-hour days of creation” does not explain how the lowest strata uniformly contain the lowest life forms and higher strata gradually reflect higher life forms. If all of this sampling took a mere six days, the entire geological record would have to be a jumbled mass of all species in a single layer. No differentiated sampling could have taken place, as all would have perished together at the time of Noah’s Flood, only fifteen hundred years later; and this is what the creationists are forced to assert. However, there is absolutely no evidence that the masses of extinct life forms, preserved in the geological record, lived in the days between Adam and Noah. The creationist assertion is absurd. As Robert Macdonald explains in a paper entitled Geology: “The fossil record contains hundreds of zones, each with its own particular faunal assemblage. What is the chance that such an invariant worldwide sequence of life forms could be built up if they all lived CONTEMPORANEOUSLY, and the sequence in which they are found were only a burial order? How could a burial order based not on water sorting, but on environments do the job?… “Suppose that in a worldwide catastrophe, one group of organisms were brought in from one area and deposited, then another assemblage from another area were deposited on top of that, and so on. A local sequence of life forms would be built up. But the chances would be against the deposition of fossils in the same order in a local sequence in another area. Consider the chance that the same order would occur in all sequences worldwide. It would be NIL! [Since different species live in different environments and different parts of the world. – Eli.] “There is NO WAY to account for the sequence in faunal succession by ONE catastrophe. Nor is there any way to account for this sequence by a SERIES of catastrophes, or by a LONG DRAWN-OUT catastrophe. If all these Paleozoic and Mesozoic organisms were contemporaneous, there would inevitably have been some mixing of early and late forms. “The ONLY explanation is that each geologic horizon does indeed represent a DIFFERENT time in the past during which a unique assemblage of life forms was living and being deposited in many parts of the world. Slow or incremental deposition is therefore essential to give time for worldwide changes in populations of fauna whose remains preserved as fossils vary from one stratum to another.” “The fossil record shows that new organisms appeared in the record from time to time, and at other times groups of organisms have become extinct. This shows that at times God created new organisms, and at other times, species were destroyed or allowed to die out. There is a continuity to this pre-Adamic world. It would appear that there is no record of the COMPLETE destruction of all life during that period before Adam.” “I therefore do not consider the pre-Adamic world as a series of creations, but one creation, even though the acts of new life forms were not all simultaneous. “The first life forms created apparently were bacteria, algae and possibly worms, ‘simple\’ organisms that could survive in a barren and sterile environment. The points in the sequence which mark the first appearance of new life forms indicate where God created new species, and added them to an already viable ecological system. These new organisms were added from time to time as the environment became prepared for them by the former ecological system. “The succession of life forms added by creation was one of generally increasing complexity and size. Thus the sequence observed in faunal succession was not a result of evolution, but one necessitated by practicality. It took a few ‘simple\’ small varieties of organisms in the beginning to prepare the way for more numerous varieties of larger and more complex organisms, and so on.” “Understanding the reasons for this sequence imparts an understanding of at least one possible purpose of the pre-Adamic creation — to prepare the earth for man. This preparation was not only of the environment, but also of the fossil fuels and our mineral resources which made possible the industrial revolution.” [For those of you who are interested in the science of geology, here is a link to a very comprehensive article explaining stratigraphical and geochronological dating methods, which incorporate the detailed study of geological strata and their comparison to other sites around the world: ] The idea that the varied types of fossils at different strata can be explained by a single event is not only illogical, it is un-Scriptural. Yet, this is what the creationists argue!! And it’s all because they take the KJV translation of the word yowm (#3117) to mean a literal, 24-hour day! With this literal interpretation of a word that can also mean “eon,” they shoot themselves in the mouth! The progression from lower forms to higher forms of life is recorded in Genesis 1. This is how Yahweh planned it and how it was put into operation. The ecology had to have lots of time to prepare the planet for the introduction of Adamic Man; and this includes the formation of topsoil for farming. Such topsoil cannot be formed in 2 or 3 literal days – certainly not from rocks that have just emerged from the watery depths! It takes centuries of decomposition, growth and more decomposition for topsoil to be formed. Considering all of these factors, the slavish acceptance of the KJV translation of ‘yowm’ into ‘24-hour day’ is silly. The geological This article describes the complexities of the biological processes that go into the formation of deposits: It provides further proof that the fifteen hundred years between Adam and Noah cannot account for either the geological record, nor the archeological record. Creationists argue that Noah’s Flood is responsible for a great deal of sedimentation, or that God pre-arranged all of the varieties of sedimentary strata beforehand. But this requires the assumption of miracles that are not stated in the Bible. There is no geological evidence for this view, either, although there is evidence for minor sedimentation dating back to the global Deluge. The rains (deluge) were global but the flood of Noah was local. William Buckland showed that the sedimentary record cannot be confined to a single event, such as Noah’s Flood. The sedimentary record is far too deep and far too varied – and the geological processes of sandstone, granite, marble formation require hundreds and thousands of years to produce such varied rocks. The creationists must assume miraculous events to have occurred, where the Bible does not state such. Therefore, these sedimentations cannot be accounted for in a single event that only lasted a year (Gen. 7:17 – 8:16, about 370 days): Some have attempted to ascribe the formation of all the stratified rocks to the effects of the Deluge; an opinion which is irreconcilable with the enormous thickness and almost infinite subdivisions of these strata, and with the numerous and regular successions which they contain of the remains of animals and vegetables, differing more and more widely from existing species, as the strata in which we find them are placed at greater depths. The fact that a large proportion of these remains belong to extinct genera, and almost all of them to extinct species, that lived and multiplied and died on or near the spots where they are now found, shows that the strata in which they occur were deposited slowly and gradually, during long periods of time, and at widely distant intervals. – Buckland, W (1980). Geology and Mineralogy Considered With Reference to Natural Theology (History of Paleontology). Ayer Company Publishing. . At the same time, evolutionism is refuted by the geological record. There is absolutely no evidence of any kind to suggest that lower life forms evolve into higher life forms. All of the evidence suggests that the higher life forms simply appeared, as if introduced by some outside force; and no “missing links” that would bridge the evolutionary gaps have ever been discovered. Again, this fact conforms to the record of Genesis 1 & 2. Pre-Adamic Whites I believe I am the first person to argue that Gen. 1:26-27 refers to Cro-Magnon Man, although Thomas A. Davies, in 1874, argued that Gen. 1:26 refers to the creation of the White Race, or pre-Adamic White people, and that Gen. 1:27 refers more specifically to THE MAN, Adam, and that particular seedline that came down through himself and Eve. For Davies and myself, this means the White Race was created and flourished before the individual man, Adam, was placed in the Garden. In addition, I have argued that all of the non-White races were already formed in Gen. 1:24-25. Today’s sermon will go into great detail on this subject. In other words, I will be arguing that all of the races, including the White Race, of this planet existed before the Garden of Eden scenario of Genesis 2. I will refine this argument as we proceed through Gen. 2 & 3, verse by verse. I will show that this is how the Bible must be interpreted, according to the meanings of the original Hebrew words. In Part 4, I argued that Kennewick Man, dated to 7,000 BC, was in fact an example of the pre-Adamic White Race, as the skeletons of Cro-Magnon are indistinguishable from modern White skeletons. [Up-to-date science here: . Up-to-date carbon dating here: ] (Both the evolutionists and the creationists want to deny this physical evidence, for their own reasons.) Thus, the skeletal differences between Cro-Magnon and modern Whites are negligible to non-existent. Although the skeletal evidence does not prove that Cro-Magnon had White skin, I have uncovered a Cro-Magnon cave drawing, also dated at 7,000 BC, which depicts a White woman whose features are no different from White women today. Please click on the link for the cave drawing of a Cro-Magnon woman. She looks just like my aunt Martha!!! This depiction of a cave-woman, wearing Medieval-style clothing, is taken from a cave-drawing; and it is a far cry from the knuckle-dragging half-ape women with bones in their noses, that all of the museums and evolutionist textbooks portray! This website demonstrates that Cro-Magnon had a larger cranium and, therefore, larger brains than modern Whites: This fact is very anti-evolutionary! Cro-Magnon skeletons have been dated as early as 30,000 BC. This emerging consensus in archeology confirms my statements about Cro-Magnon and modern Whites: Recent research over the past 20 years or so, however, has led scholars to believe that the physical dimensions of so-called \’Cro-Magnon\’ are not sufficiently different enough from modern humans to warrant a separate designation. Scientists today use \’Anatomically Modern Human\’ (AMH) or \’Early Modern Human\’ (EMH) to designate the Upper Paleolithic human beings who looked a lot like us, but did not have the complete suite of modern human behaviors. – Source: This website also demonstrates the great antiquity of the White Race and shows the Atlantis model is being reluctantly accepted by more and more mainstream archeologists, even though they refrain from using the word ‘Atlantis’: . Here is a quotation from this article: The proximity of the western shores of Atlantis to the American continent does not appear to enter the equation among most academics. But anthropological remains (bones, skulls, or nearly complete skeletons) tell us much about the kinds of people who were coming here during the ice age. On my I mentioned that Cro-Magnoid skulls have been found in the Americas, and throughout this website I have presented abundant evidence that the particular type of man known as Cro-Magnon originated in Atlantis. Since the physical world was created by Yahweh and the Bible was written by Yahweh through his prophets, there can be no contradiction in these two records. The contradictions have arisen only because of the lousy translations of Scripture and the false world views presented by the creationists and the evolutionists. By being true to both records, the harmonization of the Bible with the geological/archeological record will finally be achieved. The “Two Creations” Versus the Recapitulation Theory As a prelude to the discussion of Genesis 2, I have decided that a thorough discussion of my differences with Clifton Emahiser will be instructive, as a detailed discussion of 2SL from different perspectives will provide the reader with at least two different approaches to solving the problem of why race-mixing is being promoted by the Judeo-Christian churches. The modern-day love affair between society and miscegenation was actually foreseen in Scripture; and the world is living out these End-Time prophecies as we speak! Clifton and agree 100% that the world has become apostate and totally rebelled against Yahweh’s laws of Separation. Emahiser’s approach does not involve referring to the record of natural history. It only involves Scripture and the various commentaries, lexicons, concordances, language studies, Scriptural history, etc. He does not attempt to go into pre-history, as I have done. Clifton has gone on record, stating that he believes that Yahweh created the White Race only in Genesis 1N My interpretation of these events is, therefore, chronological, whereas Clifton’s is not. Clifton argues that no significant time passed between the events of Gen. 1:26-27 and the events of Genesis 2. In fact, he considers them to be contemporaneous to the events of Gen. 2 and are merely a more detailed explanation of the events of Genesis 1:26-27, pertaining to the Garden. DNA Evidence of the Pre-Adamic (Cro-Magnon) Existence o the White Race In addition to Kennewick man in Washington State, new evidence suggests that Caucasians of Haplogroup X roamed America many thousands of years ago, in the territories now called Ohio and Illinois. Rare Genetic Link to Europe “Disagreement swirls around the timing of their arrival, the nature of their migration, how fast they moved across the landscape and their relationship to contemporary Native Americans,” he said. Some scientists think that the earliest colonizers could have started out somewhere in Europe, not in Asia as previously thought. That idea is rooted in a rare genetic link called haplogroup X – DNA passed down through women that dates back more than 30,000 years. Recent genetic samples from remains in Illinois show that the rare European DNA was around centuries before European exploration. Today, haplogroup X is found in about 20,000 American Indians. To some researchers, its presence suggests the Mongolian ancestors of most American Indians were latecomers. Genetic tests show the DNA is completely absent from East Asian and Siberian populations. That could dispel the more than half-century old notion that humans migrated across a land bridge from Siberia at the end of the Ice Age, made stone tools and hunted while moving south. Archaeologists since 1996 have found genetic indications of several migrations, along with evidence that people came from Polynesia, regions near Japan and even western Europe. Skeleton Has Scientists Jumpy “Frankly, it makes me nervous,” Smithsonian Institution anthropologist Stephen Loring said of the idea that the first Americans during the Ice Age were of European ancestry. “It’s a heretical argument, and some people, unfortunately, will use it to assert the cultural superiority of Europeans. [Racism! Oh, my God! God doesn’t play favorites, does He? ” – Eli ] But it’s a good theory that needs to be tested.” [ Source: ] Heretical or not, this is a scientific story that needs to be pursued, because it means that our people were here first!!!! Let Stephen Loring be nervous. Truth hurts!!! Hybrid Viability: A Dead-End Street Evolutionists assume that it happens in nature, but no scientist has ever recorded such an event. To date, such hybridity happens only on farms, in zoos, and in laboratories. This geneticist gives us an idea of what needs to happen for a hybrid species to develop in nature: Hybrids do not generally give rise to new species. Because hybrid males are mostly infertile, female hybrids are mated back to pure-bred animals. In only a few generations, the “alien genes” are absorbed into the gene pool of the species she is bred back to. Theoretically, a new sub-species may arise if the population is isolated, but they will only have subtle differences such as lions retaining spots into adulthood as a result of a few lurking leopard genes in the gene pool from a leopon many generations back. – Source: Hybrid infertility not only presents a serious problem to evolutionists, it also presents a problem to Clifton Emahiser’s thesis, because he believes that all non-Whites are the specific result of hybridization between Adamites with fallen angel beings, such as Nachash in Genesis 3. While I agree that the seduction of Eve by Nachash engendered the seedline of Cain, I cannot accept the notion that all races are a product of hybridization. This is not an established fact. It is only an assumption. I believe that they were created by Yahweh at Gen. 1:24-25, along with the rest of the 6th day creation. Natural Barriers to Hybrid Viability First of all, the archeological record clearly shows that all races have existed long before the events of Genesis 2 & 3. Although I think the author in the next link has old data about Cro-Magnon man, his article reveals that the archeological record shows absolutely no evidence of evolution and that presently existing races have existed side-by-side for thousands of years, with no “missing links” ever discovered: Secondly, hybrids don’t reproduce well in nature, if at all. This is because different species will kill each other before they will mate with each other. Mules, for example, a cross between donkeys and horses, are infertile. A farmer recently told me that the animals have to be blindfolded so they don’t kill each other. Race-mixing in nature is almost unheard of. It usually only happens by accident or with human intervention. Once formed, it is very rare for hybrids to be viable on their own. Rather, like the Jews, hybrids must be cultivated, so that they can continue to parasitize the blood of a viable race. This is why Jewish men are always looking for Adamite women. The Talmudic prohibition against Jews intermarrying with non-Jews is just a clever smokescreen for the fact that Jews MUST crossbreed in order to continue to exist as a hybrid breed. It’s just another pretense of piety that no Jews ever observe, except for the dufus Jews who actually believe rabbinical rubbish. The parasite race pretends to be part of the viable race in order to fool the host race into continually mating with it. This next article, although the authors are evolutionists, explains some of the natural barriers to hybrid viability: Types of Reproductive Isolation There are many barriers to reproduction. Each species may have its own courtship displays, or breeding season, so that members of the two species do not have the opportunity to interbreed. Or, the two species may be unable to interbreed successfully because of failure of the egg to become fertilized or to develop. This suggests a simple and useful dichotomy, between pre-mating or prezygotic (i.e., pre-zygote formation) reproductive isolating mechanisms, and post-mating or postzygotic isolating mechanisms. Remember that a zygote is the cell formed by the union of two gametes and is the basis of a developing individual.
Prezygotic isolating mechanisms Ecological isolation: Species occupy different habitats. The lion and tiger overlapped in India until 150 years ago, but the lion lived in open grassland and the tiger in forest. Consequently, the two species did not hybridize in nature (although they sometimes do in zoos). Temporal isolation: Species breed at different times. In North America, five frog species of the genus Rana differ in the time of their peak breeding activity. Behavioral isolation: Species engage in distinct courtship and mating rituals… Mechanical isolation: Interbreeding is Postzygotic isolating mechanisms Hybrid inviability. Development of the zygote proceeds abnormally and the hybrid is aborted. (For instance, the hybrid egg formed from the mating of a sheep and a goat will die early in development.) Hybrid sterility. The hybrid is healthy but sterile. (The mule, the hybrid offspring of a donkey and a mare, is sterile; it is unable to produce viable gametes because the chromosomes inherited from its parents do not pair and cross over correctly during meiosis (cell division in which two sets of chromosomes of the parent cell are reduced to a single set in the products, termed gametes – see Figure). Hybrid is healthy and fertile, but less fit, or infertility appears in later generations (as witnessed in laboratory crosses of fruit flies, where the offspring of second-generation hybrids are weak and usually cannot produce viable offspring). ** Post-zygotic mechanisms are those in which hybrid zygotes fail, develop abnormally, or cannot self-reproduce and establish viable populations in nature. ** {Source:} Thirdly, it is a well-known fact that animals in nature tend to kill or reject odd-looking or weaker offspring. Given these obstacles to hybrid viability, the chances of producing a self-replicating hybrid species are very remote. In fact, such a thing has NEVER been observed in nature. But it IS the great hope of the evolutionists that such hybridity and mutations do occur, because without such hybrids and mutations, evolution is impossible. Of course, Nachash, being a highly intelligent hybrid himself, would have probably done much experimenting in trying to produce such self-replicating hybrids. It is possible that these Nephilim hybridizers met with some success; and such species, along with the non-viable ones, are precisely the ones that Yahweh instructed the Israelites to exterminate!!! From Clifton’s perspective, all non-Adamic hominids, such as Blacks, Orientals, Amerinds, Dravidians, etc., would have to be hybrid species, since he does not believe that they were created by Yahweh. I’m not saying that this is impossible, especially given the hybridization tendencies of the Nephilim/Naga/Nachash people, but I don’t think the Bible supports this view. Nor does the genetic literature support such a scenario. Here is what I stated in Enmity, Part 4, to show that I am being consistent in my arguments: From the account in Genesis 1, there is simply NO DOUBT that these pre-Adamites were also created by Elohim. Some two-seedliners like to argue that only the White Race was created by Elohim and that all other races are the product of genetic engineering, but Genesis 1 gives no hint of any such thing. It clearly states that all living things were created by Elohim. There is no doubt that such genetic manipulation has taken place; but it is not one of the themes of Genesis 1. Chayah (Eve, #’s 2331, 2332) Strong’s #2331: chavah, to live, to declare or show. Strong’s #2332: Chavvah; life-giver, the first woman, Eve. Of course, the “first woman” is James Strong’s opinion, which slavishly follows the universalistic agenda, which presumes that all races somehow “evolved” from Adam and Eve. We know that this is nonsense. The Bible does not say that Eve was the first woman. That is an assumption made by the translators and lexicographers. And this assumption has magically become part of the “definition” of Eve. This corrupt definition is an interpolation, just as “non-Jew” is an interpolation for goy, just as “Jew” is an interpolation of Yehudi. Now, with respect to the word chayah (#2651, 2652, 2653) in the Dictionary of Biblical Languages, this is the actual word by which Adam names Eve; and Eve is most definitely a living, breathing animal (hominid)! According to the DBL, word #2651 means animal; word #2652 means life…animate life; hunger; renewal; word #2653 means group (band); group (community); home (residence). Chay, Chay Nephesh, Nephesh Chay Three points of clarification: I am not saying that the Hebrew word ‘chay’ means two-legged creatures (hominids) specifically. What I am saying is that the word ‘chay’ does NOT exclude hominids; and this is based on the meanings given in Strong’s and other sources, plus how the word is used in the Scriptures. However, the expressions, “beast of the earth” and “beast of the field” more specifically identify hominids. Chay (#2416): This word simply means “alive” or ”life.” As such, this word cannot possibly be considered to exclude hominids. The fact that it is often translated as “beast” is simply a false attempt to specify a very broad generality, for the purpose of falsely translating ADAM as “man,” meaning all races. The word ‘chay’ cannot be limited to lower species, such as four-legged animals, as most traditional commentators assert. Nor can it be limited to any particular species. These are the meanings of the Hebrew word chay, according to various Bible scholars: Gesenius: alive, living; lively, vigorous; reviving; raw; fresh [Not a hint of any particular species or order of living beings, such as mammals, etc., but certainly not excluding hominids.] Dictionary of Biblical Languages: alive, i.e., the state of animal life; nourishment; exist, formally living, pertaining to…biological existence; raw; vigorous. [The same principle applies here as in Gesenius.] The New Brown-Driver-Briggs-Gesenius Hebrew and English Lexicon: adj. alive, living; of God, as the living one; kinsfolk; living thing, animal; community; having the vigor of life; life. This word, chay, according to Adam Clarke (Adam Clarke’s Bible Commentary) means, simply, an animal, in the most general sense. Hominids are animals, just like every other living, breathing creature. Again, hominids cannot be excluded from this broad category. In fact, the word chay is used most often in reference to Adamites and other hominids. All of these authors confirm that the word chay is a very broad category of living beings, confirming that I properly understand the meaning of the word. It is also possible that post-Medieval Bible scholars did not like to think of themselves as “animals,” rightly sensing that the two-legged variety is of a much higher intelligence level; but we are still flesh-and-blood animals; and all of modern science recognizes this fact. So does the Bible. It’s the “spiritual Israel” Bible distorters, who like to think of themselves as “spiritual beings,” who deny the obvious! Genesis 3:20: And Adam called his wife’s name Eve [chayah, or havah]: because she was the mother of all living [chay]. From these usages, there is no doubt that the word ‘chay’ is very broadly defined and CANNOT be limited to any zoological category, or any particular range of living animals. It cannot be used to EXCLUDE any species that lives and breathes, despite the opinions of commentators who wish to limit the meaning of the word chay to lower order species. You should realize that those who wish to limit the meaning of the word chay to lower order animals do so for the express purpose of distorting the meaning of the word ADAM, which they falsely translate as “man,” in order to INCLUDE the OTHER hominids (the other races) as the later subject of Genesis 1:26-27. This is why these distortionists have deliberately left hominids out of the category, chay! This is universalist thi This is not the way the word is used in Scripture. For example: “In the six hundredth year of Noah’s [Adamite] life (chay), in the second month….” – Gen. 7:11 “…the tree of life (chay) also in the midst of the garden…” – Gen. 2:9. “…the moving creature that has life (chay)…” – Gen. 1:20. Here is the distortionist logic, in its simplest, syllogistic form: Proposition A: Gen. 1:24-25 refers to all earthly species, except hominids. Proposition B: Gen. 1:26-27 refers exclusively to humans (all races). Proposition C: The only human beings mentioned in Genesis 1-3 are Adam and Eve. Therefore: All humans descend from Adam and Eve. Propositions A and B are clearly false, therefore only a false conclusion can follow. The logic is correct, but the premises are wrong. Here are more examples to prove the point: God is chay (Deut. 5:26; Josh. 3:10; II Kings 19:6), Adamites are chay (Gen. 43:7, 27, 28; 45:26, 28, 30, and Israelites are chay (Ex. 4:18), birds (Lev. 14:4), or any animal at all (Ex. 22:14). The word chay most definitely refers to ALL OF THESE CATEGORIES of living beings, including hominids, such as Adamites. This is patently obvious from the way the word is used throughout Scripture. Conclusion: the limitation of the word chay to living creatures below hominids, or any other zoological classification, is artificial and false. This is how Bible commentators treat the word in their own writings; and this is how the KJV translators want us to conceive of it; but the Bible says otherwise, and the basic definitions of the word chay prove that it cannot be limited to any lower-order species. This fact has huge implications for the true meaning of Gen. 1:24-25. Universalism Refuted My analysis of the subject proves that popular interpretations of Gen. 1-3 are fallacious, because all hominids are in fact INCLUDED in Gen. 1:24-25. But universalist interpreters they make these false assertions precisely because they are universalists, whose agenda is to redefine ‘Adam’ as “all races.” The reason they argue for the word ‘chay’ to mean all orders lower than the hominid is because they want ‘Adam’ to mean “all hominids,” including Blacks, Orientals and Mexicans!!! We’re “all the same,” right? “We all bleed red blood.” Right? By excluding non-Whites from the general category in which they properly belong, they then falsely include non-Whites in the category in which THEY ABSOLUTELY DO NOT BELONG . To wit: The key difference made in Genesis 1 is that the word ADAM means “to show blood in the face,” which can only be a reference to the White Race, EXCLUSIVE OF ALL OTHER RACES. Verses 26-29 clearly separate the Adamites from all other living things on the planet, including those other races, which DO NOT show blood in the face. Once this is understood, the Chosen Race doctrine flows naturally and logically from Genesis 1:26 all throughout Scripture.
Nephesh The word Nephesh (#5315) means “to breathe, a breathing creature.” Again, we have a very broad category, which includes all land animals that breathe air. Hominids CANNOT be excluded from this broad category either, despite the attempts of the universalist commentators to do so. As I said, they have an “anti-racist” agenda, by which they wish to redefine ADAM as meaning all races. This is exactly why they wish to EXCLUDE hominids from Gen. 1:23-24, so they can INCLUDE them under the false translation, ‘man.’ The combination, chay nephesh, or nephesh chay, meaning “living creature,” cannot possibly exclude hominids. Hence, Gen. 1:24-25 is inclusive of all living, breathing creatures that walk the earth (whales having been created in the waters in verse 21). Thus, all hominids are included in this category. This includes White Race, as the word chay is used even of Noah himself, and of Israelites. However the White Race is given special treatment in the next two verses. This false categorization of words is present in all documents that are infected with the Jewish agenda. Even the concordances are infected with this universalism. Adam Clarke, in discussing the translation “living creature,” starts out with an absolutely correct discussion of this expression, but then he utterly suspends logic and wanders off into universalism: Nephesh chaiyah; a general term to express all creatures endued with animal life, in any of its infinitely varied gradations [Adam Clarke, so far, sticks to how the word is defined and used in Scripture, but now deviates from both of these realities and falsely asserts that it refers to certain finite gradations, clearly contradicting himself:] from the half-reasoning elephant down to the stupid potto, or lower still, to the polype, which seems equally to share the vegetable and animal life.” After giving the correct definition of “infinite variety,” he becomes politically sycophantic (kisses joo-butt) and asserts the exact opposite!! But this opinion is utterly unjustified, as the expression nephesh chay is never limited to specific types of animals, ever. It is simply a very broad category of animal life, which is very correctly captured by the translation, “living creature.” Then he uses expressions such as “seems to signify” and “probably,” to suggest such limitations, without giving any concrete examples; and, indeed, there are none!!! In fact, the word chay is never associated with elephants in Scripture, but they cannot be excluded either!!! In addition, nephesh chay is exactly the same expression that is translated as “living soul,” in reference to Adam, in Gen. 2:7, so it definitely includes humans and Adamkind. Adam IS a living, breathing hominid. Again, my point has been that the word chay includes all hominids, including the White Race. None of the authors quoted have demonstrated anything to the contrary, except to offer their contrary opinions, and those are speculative opinions that contradict the Hebrew meaning of the words..
The Crucial Differences Rest assured that the Bible clearly differentiates between Whites and non-Whites. Gen. 1:26-27 list Adamites exclusively; and only the Adamites are made in the image and likeness of Elohim, and only to our species has dominion been promised. Indeed, only the White Race has ever claimed ownership of the land; and only the White Race, as colonizers, has ever taken possession of lands away from other races. Indeed, we invented the concept of “private property.” This is according to Yahweh’s Plan, which is the plan of salvation (salvage) of those species of animal life, including all hominids, that had come under the subjection of the Nachash fallen angels, who were responsible for the destruction of Atlantis, and who were still engaged in the production of hybrid species, even after Atlantis. Verses 28 & 29 reiterate the exclusive promise to our Race that all living things on the planet will be subject to the dominion of Adamkind, including “every living [chay] thing that moves upon the earth.” The specific point to be made here is that Lucifer/Satan understood perfectly that Adam and Eve were supposed to breed a Race of immortal beings, whose purpose was to dethrone the fallen angels. Knowing that this was Yahweh’s plan, he had to act quickly and impregnate Eve, in order to pollute her offspring, so that the Chosen Race could not be bred as planned. Everything after the seduction is the history of that Fall and the Enmity that it created, between two obviously different strains of DNA.
Neshamah Neshamah (#5397) means “a puff, i.e., wind, angry or vital breath, divine ins So, when we see the construction, “breath of life” (neshamah chay), we are speaking of soul or spirit as existing in virtually any animal, including all hominids. Examples: Gen. 2:7 – “And Yahweh Elohim formed ADAM of the dust of the ground , and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life [neshamah chay]; and ADAM became of living soul [chay nephesh]. Gen. 7:22 – “All in whose nostrils was the breath of life [neshamah chay], of all that was in the dry land, died.” Psalm 150:6 – “Let everything that has breath [neshamah] praise Yahweh.” Isa. 2:22. – “Cease ye from man {#120, adam}, whose breath [neshamah] is in his nostrils: for wherein is he to be accounted of?” Conclusion: Neshamah is also applied to a very broad spectrum of living, breathing animals, and cannot be used to distinguish between Adamites and non-Adamites. Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Days Gen. 2:2-3: “And on the 7th Day, God ended His work which He had made; and He rested on the seventh day from all His work, which He had made. And God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it: because in it He had rested from all His work which God had created and made.” Clifton Emahiser wants to deny that there was a literal 7th day; but the Hebrew word ‘yowm’ [#3117] is used in these two verses, just as it was used of all of the previous days. It is used of the seventh day no less than three times. Yahweh even commemorated it by blessing and sanctifying it! Should we pretend that it represents no time at all? I don’t think so! The verse is there, in black and white; and we have no right to ignore it. There was indeed a seventh day, just as Yahweh Himself asserts; and during this day, Yahweh did not do the work of creation. On this we agree. But, that does not mean that He did absolutely nothing, either. He obviously had to sustain what it was He created, otherwise, it would perish. As suggested earlier, I would expect that the ecology would have to be tweaked and refined, so that all of the plants and animals would live together harmoniously, for it was declared to be “very good,” but not perfect! Topsoil would require time to develop, so that agriculture could proceed in Genesis 2. Atmospheric gases would have to stabilize (CO2 +O2+N2) to properly support the life of of breathing animals, etc. In short, the ecology would have to stabilize. Whatever He was doing after the creation process, it was on the seventh day. Now, after He took this time off from the work of creation, He decided to get personally involved with the descendants of HA-ADAM, who were the White Race already created on the sixth day. But he, the individual man, Adam (eth-ha-Adam), did not yet receive the personal, special treatment, by Yahweh Himself, which would further differentiate him from the rest of his own species, just as the Israelites were much later called from among the rest of the White Race. This did not happen to eth-ha-Adam until AFTER He rested on the 7th “day.” This was when the “breath of life” was breathed into eth-ha-Adam by Yahweh Himself, giving him a potentially immortal body, conditional upon Adam’s obeying His laws. Only HA-ADAM had this “breath of life” breathed into him directly and personally by Yahweh Himself. This was not part of the creation scenario in Gen. 1. This happened exclusively to HA-ADAM in the Garden after the 7th day. After He “had rested” (past tense) [#7673: “to repose, to desist”] on the 7th day, He decided to plant a Garden, specifically for the Adamic Race to tend. Since this was AFTER HE HAD RESTED FROM CREATION ON THE 7TH DAY (same word as all the other “days”), He resumed at least some additional work, such as planting a Garden in Eden and breathing His own breathth day. The idea that Yahweh did no more work after His day of rest is an assumption that most people make, which is not justified by the language of Genesis 2. Since Yahweh clearly came out of His repose to do some very specific work on and for HA-ADAM, this had to have occurred on the 8th Day; otherwise, Yahweh would still be in repose. We are still living in this 8th day. into HA-ADAM, neither of which happened on the 6 Genesis 2:8 tells us that Yahweh PUT ADAM INTO THIS GARDEN. This was not Adam’s place of origin, as most people assume!!! Eth-ha-Adam was a specially-selected Adamite, of the Race created in Gen. 1:26-27, who was chosen for a special job, namely, to tend this Garden while in the incorrupt body YET TO BE formed by Yahweh in the Garden, when HA-ADAM was put into a deep sleep and Eve formed from him. The fact that eth-ha-Adam was placed into the Garden from somewhere outside of the Garden is confirmed in Gen. 3:23, where we are told of Adam, after he sinned, being also ejected from the Garden: “Therefore, Yahweh Elohim sent him forth from the Garden of Eden, to till the ground from where he was taken.” We have been led to believe that Adam was created IN THE GARDEN. This is also untrue! The question becomes: “What do the Judeo-Christians have right?” Given this understanding, we can now intelligently, from both Scripture and natural history, answer the questions “From where did Cain get his wife?” He got her from the chay hominids created in Gen. 1:24-27. Since Jews must hybridize in order to keep their breed alive, he would naturally have chosen a White woman from among those created in Gen. 1:26. From verses 2:8 and 3:23, it is clear that eth-ha-Adam was a mortal Adamite (as are all living creatures on this planet) before being put into the Garden; and he emerged as a mortal again, after having had a tantalizing taste of immortality for a good number of years. Just reflecting on this leaves me drooling!!! Oh, what could have been!!!! Conclusion: There is absolutely no doubt that Gen. 1:24-25 are referring to a broad class of living creatures, among which are included ALL HOMINIDS. This is proven from how the word ‘chay’ is used throughout Scripture. The word studies make this very clear; but “modern” Churchianity has no interest in getting the true meanings of the Hebrew words established or restored. They are perfectly comfortable in their delusions and lies. One final point: Yahweh clearly created Lucifer/Satan, the angel who rebelled. If He can create an angel that rebelled, He can also create non-Adamites, which He did. Therefore, I must reject Clifton Emahiser’s thesis that all non-Whites could only have been produced by deliberate hybridization by the fallen ones. Because he begins with this dubious premise (all non-Whites are the product of hybridization), he is led down a wrong path, which will yield ever more contradictory results and futile speculations. I suggest that Clifton’s assumption that Yahweh did not create the other races is both un-Scriptural and unscientific. The fact is that Yahweh created EVERYTHING THAT EXISTS in Genesis 1, except hybrids. That is an honor that the Jews can claim. From the existing races, which Yahweh created, hybrids can be formed. This activity is forbidden, and on this we totally agree. However, it is not true that the other races are only the result of hybridization by the Nephilim with Adamites. All of the races were created on the 6th Day (Gen. 1:24-25), just before the creation of the Adamites later the same “day.” But the Nephilim absolutely did, at some point in history, perform hybridization experiments WITH the existing races, probably even before Adam was placed in the Garden, meaning that he (Nachash) had already been engaged in the production of slave races for his evil purposes. Having been presented with Yahweh’s potentially immortal Adamic Rac Dissecting Genesis 2-4:1 Given all of the word studies that have gone into Parts 1-4, plus those in this Part so far, I believe we can now do a verse by verse analysis of Genesis, Chapters 2 & 3, plus the crucial verse, Gen. 4:1. We will find that 2SL (Two-Seedline) is the only interpretation of these early chapters that can possibly be correct. Everything else is mere guesswork and makes no sense at all. Thousands of potential Christians have been driven away from Christianity because the churches have no answers to such questions as: “Where did Cain get his wife?” “How could all races come from Adam and Eve?” “Did Adam and Eve commit incest with their own children in order to breed more Adamites?” 2SL has the solution to all of these heretofore unexplainable mysteries; and it is both scientific and Scriptural. The fact is that the KJV has made mincemeat of the Hebrew; and all attempts to explain away – or to avoid having to explain – the obvious contradictions, that are created by this mincemeat, are nothing but hogwash added to an obviously rancid stew!!! Genesis, Chapter 2, Explained 1 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. This is obviously speaking of more than just the physical world. We all assume that our planet, outer space, and the atmosphere are included in this description. But the word host comes from the Hebrew word, tsaba {#6635}, which means “a mass of persons or things organized, as for war (army): company, host soldiers.” The expression, “heavenly host,” always refers to the angels of heaven, the spiritual realm, which is not ordinarily accessible to our human experience. (Luke 2:13-15.) Those who wish to deny the existence of the spiritual world must deny hundreds of scriptures, which affirm its existence. 2 And on the seventh day God finished his work which he had done, and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had done. 3 So God blessed the seventh day and hallowed it, because on it God rested from all his work which he had done in creation. As explained earlier, the word yowm {#3117} must be taken as meaning an age of unspecified length, just as in all of the verses in Genesis 1. [Here is a good scholarly article on the subject of yowm and why it does not meaning a literal day in Genesis 1: http://www.answersincreation.org/The%20Hebrew%20Word%20Yom%20Used%20with%20a%20Number%20in%20Genesis%201%20-%20distribution.pdf by Rodney Whitefield, Ph.D.] Here is a brief quotation from this article: In order to illustrate the differing opinions which have been offered as interpretation, I will very briefly quote two well-known Bible scholars about the numbering of the word “yom.” Both scholars hold “extended period” or “age” views of the meaning of “yom” as describing the duration of the creative times. Subsequently, I will explain why the opinion of these two scholars has substantial support in the Hebrew, in contradiction to the claim in the MacArthur Study Bible. Dr. Whitefield goes on to explain why the Hebrew grammar supports the “eon” interpretation of ‘yowm’ in Gen. 1. The word rested is from the Hebrew shabath {#7673}, meaning “to repose, desist.” Since the sun and the stars weren’t created until the 4th “day,” and grasses and trees were already formed on the third “day,” these cannot be literal, 24-hour days. Grass can’t grow without the sun being in place first. Only my proposed Recovery Theory can explain the reverse order of these events. 4 These are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created. In the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens, Generations comes from the Hebrew toledawdescent, family.” Since this word describes both the heavens and the earth, both are treated as being populated with living entities, both visible and invisible. {#8435}, meaning “ 5 when no plant of the field was yet in the earth and no herb of the field had yet sprung up–for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was no man to till the ground; The word field comes from the Hebrew sadeh {#7704}, meaning “to spread out: a field as flat.” This word implies cultivation, as for farming. “The Hebrew sadeh is not adequately represented by our ‘field;’ the two words agree in describing cultivated land , but they differ in point of extent, the sadeh being specifically applied to what is unenclosed.” – Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, Volume 3, p. 551. Also, we can take verse 5 quite literally, when it tells us that it had not yet rained upon the earth, as our planet had quite a different atmosphere in those days, with the atmosphere above containing much more water then than it does today. The pre-Flood atmosphere, because of this additional water suspended “in the firmament,” was much denser and more humid. This density and humidity were the conditions required for the dinosaur age, which required abundant plant life, providing abundant food for gigantic creatures, even contributing to longer life spans for humans. The dinosaur age was apparently ended by an earlier catastrophe, which was followed by a major ice age, with most dinosaurs having become extinct before the Phaeton event, which destroyed Atlantis. I subscribe to Isaac Newton Vail’s Canopy theory, which postulates that this canopy of water eventually collapsed, causing the rains of Noah’s Flood. This canopy consisted of a heavy, thick cloud cover, which would have allowed mainly diffused sunlight to illuminate the atmosphere during the daytime, except at the poles, where the sky was visible and direct sunlight was allowed in. II Esdras actually confirms this view:
Verse 5 also tells us that Adam was created to till the soil. The White Race has, without question, been the foremost farming Race of all. White farmers have literally fed the world; and that same world is turning against the hand that feeds it. Rudimentary farming, such as minor planting and reaping may have occurred before Adam, but tilling the soil and growing huge fields of crops was not invented until Adam came along. [The archeology of Anatolia shows that farming began there somewhere between 9,000 – 6,000 BC: ] A detailed discussion of Vail’s Canopy Theory would have to be reserved for an analysis of pre-Flood and post-Flood archeology and geology. The fact is that there is much of this type of evidence available. Here is an excellent article on the subject, for those who are interested: 6 but a mist went up from the earth and watered the whole face of the ground– 7 then the LORD God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nos |